Planet-9 > General Discussions > Automotive Off Topic » Porsche 997 Turbo vs Nissan GT-R R35 video


Automotive Off Topic This is the place for topics that are not Cayman specific but are automotive related in some way. This is not an anything goes forum, Keep it clean!

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #21  
Old 01-18-2008, 07:43 AM
'ringmeister's Avatar
Porsche Activist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 304
Country: Country
Originally Posted by eecsdude View Post
» Blog Archive » Nurburgring Lap Times

the 7:38 time was for slicks
no it wasn't. that rumor has been beaten to death on multiple forums. It was a the result of badly translated interview with one of the nissan engineers. what the guy really said was "that to go any faster it would require cut-slicks" (or something to that effect)

Last edited by 'ringmeister; 01-18-2008 at 07:53 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #22  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:13 AM
ezmoney's Avatar
Member of Northeast Group

500 post club
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 758
Images: 3
Country: Country
Originally Posted by filahebe View Post
I don't think anyone here should get too exited about the performance of the Nissan. I don't think many people will cross-shop the Turbo and GT-R. I don't think many people will cross-shop the GT-R with any other Porsche for that matter. I can at least speak for myself when I say that when I bought my 2.7 no other brand was even on the radar.

Even if it's actually faster than the Turbo, that doesn't take anything away from the Porsche. The Turbo (and the entire 911 line) is actually a compromised design. A rear engine car with a flat six motor is not the fastest way to go around the track.

I think the Nissan looks good. It's not an elegant design but it has a very original style to it. It's almost like it belongs on a Mad Max film set.

You got to give it to Nissan though. They made one hell of a car for well under $100K.
I'm sure the folks in Zuffenhausen have not only noticed the performance of the GT-R but the price. They are probably waiting to see how the GT-R sells.
I think that it may be wishful thinking by filahebe to think that noone will cross shop the GT-R with any Porsche. There isn't an infinite number of people buying cars in the 70k plus price range. Even if the GT-R didn't out perform the 997 Turbo it is still very competitive for 60k less. Porsche will have to see if the GT-R will take part of the market share. This could be good for people who want to buy a Porsche. Porsche will have to become more competitive price wise or face losing part of their market.

If Nissan can build a car with that type of performance for just about half the price of a 997 Turbo (and less than a base Carrera or Carrera S) perhaps Porsche will be forced to lower prices.

It would be naive to think that price doesn't matter to most people (yes there are some who will buy a Porsche regardless of price). I've read endless threads on this site complaining, or at least commenting on the high cost of the cars and the options. I also see how eager everyone is to get group discounts for products for the Cayman and Cayman S.

Porsche will either keep up with the competition or eventually be part of automotive history like Hudson, Packard, Studebaker and a host of other companies. Yes it can happen . . . . look at the automotive giants here in the USA. Soon they will all be overtaken by foreign manufactures.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll do anything for money except work. You have to draw the line somewhere.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #23  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:51 AM
gilly's Avatar
Porsche Chatter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Country: Country
997tt is distinctly not designed for racing in track like Gt2/3.
No doubt gtr can beat tt on track.Actually,GT-r has about 550 hp on crank.It's more powerful than the TT.Imo,the biggest difference between these 2 cars is awd system.Nissan's Attest Awd system is far more better than Porsche's awd.
We can see that GT-R is almost as fast as tt in straight but faster in the corner due to the advanced awd system
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #24  
Old 01-18-2008, 02:46 PM
chows4us's Avatar
Guest

3,000 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,675
Images: 9
Originally Posted by ezmoney View Post
... If Nissan can build a car with that type of performance for just about half the price of a 997 Turbo (and less than a base Carrera or Carrera S) perhaps Porsche will be forced to lower prices.

It would be naive to think that price doesn't matter to most people (yes there are some who will buy a Porsche regardless of price). I've read endless threads on this site complaining, or at least commenting on the high cost of the cars and the options.
I think your way off base here (just my opinion).

See the demographics in this study here. Appendix VI. That study was from 2001. Check out the incomes and types of personalities.

There is a huge difference between a buyer of a TT vs any Nissan. I seriously doubt any potential TT buyer would look twice at a Nissan (OK, not any but few ... never say never). The most obvious reason being, snooty as it might sound, because its not a Porsche.

As to price mattering, I also think your off base. The difference between a $65K CS and a $135K TT is huge (well double). The market demographics are totally different. People complaining about the high costs of Porsche options or seeking group buys ... do you really think a potential TT buyer cares much about the cost of some option he/she may want. OTH, if your barely scraping enough money up to get a stripped, Cayman, then say $3K for Nav is huge (in comparison).IMO, there will be very few potential GT3/TT/GT2 buyers will be interested in this car. There is no record of reliability. Remember that old saying associated with Porsche ... "To finish first, first you have to finish"? If you buy a GT3 for track time, are you going to risk buying a Nissan with no track record in reliability? .

997 and 997S potential buyers? I also doubt it will effect them. 911 is the Icon. Period. Buyer of theses cars will have been wanting one all their lives and no Japanese "sportscar" will likely sway them.

CS potential buyers? Yes maybe, for some. If their only interest is owning the fastest car on the block, competition for a Z06, then maybe ... but maybe not. If you read buyers threads here, others have decided to not buy a Z06 in lieu of a CS, regardless of the fact the Z06 is much faster. After all, your still buying a Chevy. Potential Cayman owners may still look at the Nissan the same way. No matter how you cut it, it's still a Nissan.

Sorry to disagree but I doubt it will have much of an impact on PAG but if it does, it will be most likely on the low end cars in their line.

I just can't see someone about to put an order in for a TT saying:

"Hey that Nissan is just as fast ... forget the TT, I'm buying a Nissan"

If I did that my wife would kill me! (and my first "sportscar" was 240Z)

Last edited by chows4us; 01-18-2008 at 02:51 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #25  
Old 01-18-2008, 04:20 PM
ezmoney's Avatar
Member of Northeast Group

500 post club
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 758
Images: 3
Country: Country
Originally Posted by chows4us View Post
I think your way off base here (just my opinion).

See the demographics in this study here. Appendix VI. That study was from 2001. Check out the incomes and types of personalities.

There is a huge difference between a buyer of a TT vs any Nissan. I seriously doubt any potential TT buyer would look twice at a Nissan (OK, not any but few ... never say never). The most obvious reason being, snooty as it might sound, because its not a Porsche.

As to price mattering, I also think your off base. The difference between a $65K CS and a $135K TT is huge (well double). The market demographics are totally different. People complaining about the high costs of Porsche options or seeking group buys ... do you really think a potential TT buyer cares much about the cost of some option he/she may want. OTH, if your barely scraping enough money up to get a stripped, Cayman, then say $3K for Nav is huge (in comparison).IMO, there will be very few potential GT3/TT/GT2 buyers will be interested in this car. There is no record of reliability. Remember that old saying associated with Porsche ... "To finish first, first you have to finish"? If you buy a GT3 for track time, are you going to risk buying a Nissan with no track record in reliability? .

997 and 997S potential buyers? I also doubt it will effect them. 911 is the Icon. Period. Buyer of theses cars will have been wanting one all their lives and no Japanese "sportscar" will likely sway them.

CS potential buyers? Yes maybe, for some. If their only interest is owning the fastest car on the block, competition for a Z06, then maybe ... but maybe not. If you read buyers threads here, others have decided to not buy a Z06 in lieu of a CS, regardless of the fact the Z06 is much faster. After all, your still buying a Chevy. Potential Cayman owners may still look at the Nissan the same way. No matter how you cut it, it's still a Nissan.

Sorry to disagree but I doubt it will have much of an impact on PAG but if it does, it will be most likely on the low end cars in their line.

I just can't see someone about to put an order in for a TT saying:

"Hey that Nissan is just as fast ... forget the TT, I'm buying a Nissan"

If I did that my wife would kill me! (and my first "sportscar" was 240Z)
Perhaps I didn't make myself clear when I stated which Porsches MIGHT be effected. You are right that it won't be the high end cars. This is the Cayman Club so I was referring to the Cayman and Cayman S. We will never know how many sales are lost to Z06's, SLK 55 AMG's or the new GT-R.

Porsche is a car company not a non profit organization so any loss of market share has to concern them. Increased competition can only help lower prices and increase quality, performance, etc.

I decided on a Cayman S rather than a Z06 or a SLK 55 AMG, so did the members of CC or they would be on different web sites, not his one.

I've had my share of BMW's and Mercedes Benz (I bought my first Benz in 1966 when I lived in Germany). I passed up the other makes and have decided to purchase a Cayman S. You're preaching to the choir when you talk about quality and dependability. I agree with you.

I have NEVER owned a Japanese car, and I don't intend to buy one now

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll do anything for money except work. You have to draw the line somewhere.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #26  
Old 01-18-2008, 04:40 PM
chows4us's Avatar
Guest

3,000 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,675
Images: 9
Originally Posted by ezmoney View Post
Perhaps I didn't make myself clear when I stated which Porsches MIGHT be effected. You are right that it won't be the high end cars. This is the Cayman Club so I was referring to the Cayman and Cayman S.
Ahh, since the video was about the TT vs GTR, I assumed (wrongly) that you were talking about bleeding sales off from the TT.

In that case, we may agree as I said:

CS potential buyers? Yes maybe, for some. If their only interest is owning the fastest car on the block, competition for a Z06, then maybe ... but maybe not. If you read buyers threads here, others have decided to not buy a Z06 in lieu of a CS, regardless of the fact the Z06 is much faster. After all, your still buying a Chevy. Potential Cayman owners may still look at the Nissan the same way. No matter how you cut it, it's still a Nissan.

Interesting that Nissan is targeting the TT yet I seriously doubt they will get many buyers in that market.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #27  
Old 01-18-2008, 06:20 PM
Site Donor

500 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 751
Country: Country
Originally Posted by eecsdude View Post
» Blog Archive » Nurburgring Lap Times

the 7:38 time was for slicks
sir, if you're referring to the:

7.38* 161.628 km/h Nissan R34 GTR, *company test driver Suzuki, slick cut tyres, track partially wet

that's for the R34, which is the really much inferior previous version of the car which is about 7 years old ... the new version is R35.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #28  
Old 01-18-2008, 06:53 PM
ezmoney's Avatar
Member of Northeast Group

500 post club
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 758
Images: 3
Country: Country
Originally Posted by chows4us View Post
Interesting that Nissan is targeting the TT yet I seriously doubt they will get many buyers in that market.
When you're the fastest on the draw all of the new guys challenge you. They want to be the top gun. Porsche is the standard by which most sports cars are judged. Nissan wants to be as good as the TT (performance wise) at a much lower price to lure people in the 70K price range. I guess they figure that the GT-R will be seen as a "poor mans TT".

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've spent 80% of all the money I ever made on fast cars and fast women. I wasted the other 20%!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #29  
Old 01-19-2008, 12:30 AM
eecsdude's Avatar
Porsche Activist
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 253
Images: 1
I was actually looking at:

Nurburgring 7:38 on cut slicks? - FreshAlloy.com Forums

The cut slicks they talk about = semi-slicks used in GT3 and GT2. The 997 turbo does not come with those tires in stock form and I'm not sure what tires were used on the 997tt for its 'ring times...



Originally Posted by caySman View Post
sir, if you're referring to the:

7.38* 161.628 km/h Nissan R34 GTR, *company test driver Suzuki, slick cut tyres, track partially wet

that's for the R34, which is the really much inferior previous version of the car which is about 7 years old ... the new version is R35.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #30  
Old 01-19-2008, 12:37 AM
Kor's Avatar
Kor Kor is offline
Porsche Purist
1,000 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,093
Country: Country
To the guy who said TT buyers wouldn't consider any Nissan...

For the record, I'm a potential TT buyer who would give the Nissan a shot.

Frankly anyone who didn't, I wouldn't really respect as much. You should at least take it for a drive before you judge it. If the ONLY reason you drive a car is for the brand on the hood, you should maybe take another look at your priorities in life.

If I drove any car tomorrow and it was better than my Cayman, I'd start thinking about the switch. I don't care if it was made by Nisssan or Kia or Mattel.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #31  
Old 01-19-2008, 02:34 AM
Gator Bait's Avatar
PCA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 308
Images: 5
Country: Country
Originally Posted by Kor View Post
To the guy who said TT buyers wouldn't consider any Nissan...

For the record, I'm a potential TT buyer who would give the Nissan a shot.

Frankly anyone who didn't, I wouldn't really respect as much. You should at least take it for a drive before you judge it. If the ONLY reason you drive a car is for the brand on the hood, you should maybe take another look at your priorities in life.

If I drove any car tomorrow and it was better than my Cayman, I'd start thinking about the switch. I don't care if it was made by Nisssan or Kia or Mattel.
How I feel exactly. If the car is better (performance, braking, cornering, price, quality, etc...) then it certainly warrants a look.
__________________
2006 Cayman S
Black/Sand Beige, Tiptronic, Clear Side Markers, Auto A/C,
Colored Wheel Crests, Sycamore shift knob, Sycamore e-brake.

1973 Datsun 240Z

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/838926 240Z
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2668635 Cayman S
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #32  
Old 01-19-2008, 04:03 AM
ezmoney's Avatar
Member of Northeast Group

500 post club
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 758
Images: 3
Country: Country
Originally Posted by Kor View Post

I don't care if it was made by Nisssan or Kia or Mattel.
With the price of a Porsche much higher in Canada than in the USA I guess that something from Mattel would be acceptable!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I started with nothing. I still have most of it left!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #33  
Old 01-19-2008, 06:15 AM
K-Man S's Avatar
Admin & Founder

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 21,203
Blog Entries: 13
Images: 2726
Country: Country
I may just be guessing here, but if a new Skyline were better than a Cayman in every category I'm not sure many here could actually eek out that difference other than straight line performance. I don't think 99.9% of owners drive their car at 10/10ths or honestly even could on a track and especially not on the 'Ring. The Cayman is often rated the best handling sports car in the world, I'm doubtful that with all that weight that the new Skyline could match its handling or "feel" but certainly if you take a test drive and like something better then go ahead and switch.
__________________

My Garage | My Gallery | My Articles | My Blog |My Classifieds

K-Man S
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #34  
Old 01-19-2008, 06:45 AM
Gator Bait's Avatar
PCA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 308
Images: 5
Country: Country
Porsche Logo

K -Man S, the "feel" is that variable which will be very difficult for others to achieve. The CS has spoiled me and it will take a very special car for me to part with it - so far, it is not out there! But, if I was really looking to replace it, I would be judging the other cars on their characteristics, not just the emblem. I realize however that others will not consider anything other than a Porsche, and Porsche appreciates that greatly!
__________________
2006 Cayman S
Black/Sand Beige, Tiptronic, Clear Side Markers, Auto A/C,
Colored Wheel Crests, Sycamore shift knob, Sycamore e-brake.

1973 Datsun 240Z

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/838926 240Z
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2668635 Cayman S
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #35  
Old 01-19-2008, 07:07 AM
chows4us's Avatar
Guest

3,000 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,675
Images: 9
Originally Posted by Kor View Post
To the guy who said TT buyers wouldn't consider any Nissan...

For the record, I'm a potential TT buyer who would give the Nissan a shot.
That would be me and I wrote:

"I seriously doubt any potential TT buyer would look twice at a Nissan (OK, not any but few ... never say never). The most obvious reason being, snooty as it might sound, because its not
a Porsche."

I wrote "few". Go read the demographics study I pointed to. I believe from those demographics that anyone who can afford a new TT or a new Nissan, the vast majority simply will not buy it because its not a Porsche. If your spending $140K for a car, then brand marketing means a lot.

It has nothing to do with which one is faster. At a certain point in life, some people no longer care that one car is .5 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile or 3 seconds faster around the Ring.

Those are not meaningful things that the average person can replicate compared to the professional driver nor be able to use on public highways. Those things mean very little.

OTH the prestige of owning a new TT vs a new Nissan. No contest. Yes, the brand on the hood does matter. It might not to you but it may to them. It's no different than saying a Timex may keep better time than a Rolex but the people with the money to buy the Rolex will buy the Rolex simply because of brand. If you don't think brand is important to companies, go figure out why trademarks, logos, etc are carefully guarded (as in Ford recently taking action to protect its logo on calendars). Brand is very important. Brand recognition is big time.

I said, never say never. I'm talking the majority of potential new TT buyers. At $140K for a car, your buying decisions are not necessarily driven by 0 - 60 numbers. There is far more to it than that. Emotion may be a much bigger part.

This is not to characterize potential TT owners as driven solely by brand because I believe there is far more to it than that. But I do believe brand is a very big part of the buying decision.

Last edited by chows4us; 01-19-2008 at 07:53 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #36  
Old 01-19-2008, 07:47 AM
chows4us's Avatar
Guest

3,000 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,675
Images: 9
To clarify, look at the demographic study referenced.

2001 - buyers, personalities identified as elitists, people who view the car as a means to an end itself, etc. I really doubt they will buy a Nissan over a TT.

2001 interview with Porsche CEO

Average 911 buyer income $310K. That's 7 years ago and is not the average income of a TT buyer. What would be the average income of a new TT buyer today?

That is why I believe that to many, buying a new 997 Turbo is a means to an end itself, maybe accumulative wish to be gained sometime in life. A bunch of numbers around some race track that they will never see may mean nothing whatsover. The fact that this Nissan may be a bit faster ... means nothing in comparison to fulfilling their lifetime dream.

My point here is that look outside of the box from the perspective of someone about to fulfill this dream of a new top of the line Porsche 997 Turbo. After dropping down $140,000 at the dealer, do you really think the fact, for the majority of buyers, that a Nissan down the street is 5 seconds faster around the Ring is going to matter?

Given the demographics in that study, I doubt it. Emotion is involved here and it has nothing to do with some numbers achieved by Walter Roehl or whoever.

Last edited by chows4us; 01-19-2008 at 07:54 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #37  
Old 01-19-2008, 08:49 AM
Site Donor

500 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 751
Country: Country
I have actually sat in a GT-R stationary (it is not yet homologated for street use here) and have gone through every inch. This car is actually the same price as the Cayman S in Singapore due to some creative tax declarations by Nissan importers.

This car does not compete against the 997 Turbo in Singapore. Not in the least. Instead, because of its price point, it takes away sales from the Audi RS4, the BMW M3, Z4M and definitely the Cayman S. BMW had to drop the price of the E92 M3 by an estimated US$20K (10%) probably because of the GT-R.

But as I see it, it hardly touches 997 and the AMG C63market at all, because to 997 buyers, especially those who bought the 997 C2 in preference to the Cayman, they bought it because it is a 911, the embodiment of Porsche, and these people at the back of their minds is the thinking that Porsches must be only the rear engined 911.

Most people love the feeling of the straightline punch of the GT-R or a 400+ HP monster, thus the appeal of the GT-R. It is a given that the best selling car costing cayman S money and above for 2008 in Singapore would DEFINITELY be the GT-R, that is a GUARANTEE. I would wager that more GT-Rs would be sold here in 2008 compared to ALL the non-SUV Porsche variants.

As long as Porsche does not RACE the Cayman officially, Cayman buyers will remain less religiously loyal than 997 buyers, and Porsche will more easily lose market share in the segment the Cayman competes in than their 997 market segment.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #38  
Old 01-19-2008, 08:50 AM
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 277
Country: Country
Originally Posted by ezmoney View Post
I'm sure the folks in Zuffenhausen have not only noticed the performance of the GT-R but the price. They are probably waiting to see how the GT-R sells.
I think that it may be wishful thinking by filahebe to think that noone will cross shop the GT-R with any Porsche. There isn't an infinite number of people buying cars in the 70k plus price range. Even if the GT-R didn't out perform the 997 Turbo it is still very competitive for 60k less. Porsche will have to see if the GT-R will take part of the market share. This could be good for people who want to buy a Porsche. Porsche will have to become more competitive price wise or face losing part of their market.

If Nissan can build a car with that type of performance for just about half the price of a 997 Turbo (and less than a base Carrera or Carrera S) perhaps Porsche will be forced to lower prices.

It would be naive to think that price doesn't matter to most people (yes there are some who will buy a Porsche regardless of price). I've read endless threads on this site complaining, or at least commenting on the high cost of the cars and the options. I also see how eager everyone is to get group discounts for products for the Cayman and Cayman S.

Porsche will either keep up with the competition or eventually be part of automotive history like Hudson, Packard, Studebaker and a host of other companies. Yes it can happen . . . . look at the automotive giants here in the USA. Soon they will all be overtaken by foreign manufactures.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll do anything for money except work. You have to draw the line somewhere.
So do you agree or disagree? You seem to change your mind during the last few posts...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #39  
Old 02-21-2008, 06:54 AM
TX-KmanS's Avatar
Super Moderator & PCA Member

3,000 post club
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,245
Images: 248
Country: Country
Video Comparison

Here's another comparison video between the 997TT vs. the Nissan GT-R. Not the greatest of videos, but I thought I'd share.

__________________
Meet my Mistress...

My Pictures My Cayman S

My Porsche Cars

2008 Carrera 4 Cab
2007 Cayman S
2006 Cayenne S Titanium Edition (gone )
1982 944 (Amoung first shipment to come to US; number 6 off the boat)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #40  
Old 02-21-2008, 12:04 PM
DaveN007's Avatar
Caymaniac

3,000 post club
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,702
Images: 10
Country: Country
Well...I know one person interested in buying a GT-R who is a current 997TT owner. My brother. His issue is the dealer mark-up. Dealers are starting at $50k over and working down to shake as much money out of the trees as they can It would not replace his Turbo or his M5. It would be a track toy.

I think the assumption that people who can afford to pay $200k for a car are somehow less able to recognize and enjoy an objectively cool car is a bit of class envy, frankly. It reminds me of the folks who claim that Ferrari owners can't drive. My brother is also looking at F430s. And a Lotus. And the R8. And he can drive.

Car people like cars.

Back down at my level, I like this car for example...
__________________

2007 Speed Yellow Cayman GT 2.7 (retired)
2008 Guards Red Cayman GT 3.4
"Carpe Cayman"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.planet-9.com/automotive-off-topic/19379-porsche-997-turbo-vs-nissan-gt-r-r35-video.html
Posted By For Type Date
youtube.gt | VIRGILIO Ricerca | Web This thread Refback 10-27-2008 07:18 AM
Nurburgring Lap Times » Nissan Forums Philippines This thread Refback 10-04-2008 08:11 AM
"RE: Porsche 997 Turbo vs Nissan GT-R R35 video - The Cayman Club" - thread profile :: BoardReader This thread Refback 03-01-2008 04:47 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

Copyright ©2005-2010, This site is owned & operated by K-Man Group, LLC. It is not affiliated with Porsche AG, PCNA, PCA, or POC. www.planet-9.com is not sponsored by, authorized by, sanctioned by Porsche AG, Porscheplatz 1, DE-70435 Stuttgart, All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Please consult a competent mechanic before making any modifications to your car.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2