Planet-9 > General Discussions > Porsche Sales & Leasing > Cayman and Boxster Configurations » A CS w/Sport Chron Package and PASM vs. not having either?


Cayman and Boxster Configurations This is the place to post your Cayman or Boxster spec or configuration or to compare one configuration to another.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-17-2009, 06:21 PM
GoHack's Avatar
PCA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 35
A CS w/Sport Chron Package and PASM vs. not having either?

Hi,

I'm looking at two, 2006 CS's, one of which comes w/the Sport Chrono Package, that has the PCM (Porsche Communications Management and Sport Chrono Timer, and the PASM - Porsche Active Suspension Management. The other CS is w/o these packages.

Is the CS w/these options, worth getting, vs. a CS w/o the options? Do the PCM and PASM have any issues, such as failing or not working, etc?


Thanks.



.

Last edited by GoHack; 03-17-2009 at 09:54 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #2  
Old 03-18-2009, 05:24 AM
K-Man S's Avatar
Admin & Founder

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 21,203
Blog Entries: 13
Images: 2726
Country: Country
Re: A CS w/Sport Chron Package and PASM vs. not having either?

Originally Posted by GoHack View Post
Hi,

I'm looking at two, 2006 CS's, one of which comes w/the Sport Chrono Package, that has the PCM (Porsche Communications Management and Sport Chrono Timer, and the PASM - Porsche Active Suspension Management. The other CS is w/o these packages.

Is the CS w/these options, worth getting, vs. a CS w/o the options? Do the PCM and PASM have any issues, such as failing or not working, etc?


Thanks.
.
Well it somewhat depends on the price difference but more so what you are looking for in a Cayman S. If it were me I'd get the car with PCM, PASM and SC because I like and use all of them. My car came with PASM and SC and I later retrofitted PCM. Initially a car with those 3 options is going to be what about $7K higher in price, but on the resale market the difference may not be as much in which case you benefit from someone else taking the depreciation on the options and making it a better "deal" for you.

You need to drive both to see how the ride differs in sport vs. non-sport mode for both SC and PASM and see which you like best. As far as problems with any of those systems I'd say "no" because to date there have been very few problems with any of those 3 items, nothing that seems systemic. Obviously there are complaints about PCM's lack of an iPod connection, but that can be retrofitted with a Dension or other unit. If you were going to rip the suspension out and install a track-only suspension then I'd say pass on PASM, but if you want to enjoy a flexible car that can be both a good daily street driver as well as a weekend track toy, then I think PASM and SC are both nice additions.

Please check the FAQ on this site for the details on each option.

Ultimately, whichever you choose you are going to get a mighty fine car!
__________________

My Garage | My Gallery | My Articles | My Blog |My Classifieds

K-Man S
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
  #3  
Old 03-18-2009, 10:42 AM
GoHack's Avatar
PCA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 35
Re: A CS w/Sport Chron Package and PASM vs. not having either?

Originally Posted by K-Man S View Post
Well it somewhat depends on the price difference but more so what you are looking for in a Cayman S. If it were me I'd get the car with PCM, PASM and SC because I like and use all of them. My car came with PASM and SC and I later retrofitted PCM. Initially a car with those 3 options is going to be what about $7K higher in price, but on the resale market the difference may not be as much in which case you benefit from someone else taking the depreciation on the options and making it a better "deal" for you.

You need to drive both to see how the ride differs in sport vs. non-sport mode for both SC and PASM and see which you like best. As far as problems with any of those systems I'd say "no" because to date there have been very few problems with any of those 3 items, nothing that seems systemic. Obviously there are complaints about PCM's lack of an iPod connection, but that can be retrofitted with a Dension or other unit. If you were going to rip the suspension out and install a track-only suspension then I'd say pass on PASM, but if you want to enjoy a flexible car that can be both a good daily street driver as well as a weekend track toy, then I think PASM and SC are both nice additions.

Please check the FAQ on this site for the details on each option.

Ultimately, whichever you choose you are going to get a mighty fine car!
Thank you for responding.

My main concern is w/the suspension mostly. If there has been any problems w/it failing, such as w/the adjustable shocks. Concerns about the future problems, because this is going to be a long time ownership vehicle.

I've never been a fan of added bells and whisles, such as electric windows and power seats. I know electric windows, at least on other vehicles, have been known to fail, and can be quit costly to repair, especially as the vehicle gets older.

These two CS's are being sold at a Chevy Dealership, and so I don't think they even know what is in this vehicle. When I saw it, I recognized it right away. This one is $42K, and the other CS that they have is is $44K. This one is loaded w/the above, but has 14K miles on it, and the other isn't, but has only 7K miles on it.

If I should go w/it, I will have it checked out at a local Porsche Service Department. I've already made an appointment.

In the mean time, I've got an appointment tomorrow at that same Porsche dealership to talk about a couple of 2006 CS's that they have.

I fell in love w/the CS when it first came out in 2006, and vowed that someday I would get one.

As I read some of the posts here, I didn't know that there have been problems w/the engine. I talked w/a Porsche mechanic the other day, and he happened to mention Porsche using sealed bearings at the end of the cam shafts, and that they sometimes fail. Then reading here about the problems w/the rear main bearing getting starved of oil and failing. I'm surprised since Porsche products have been race proven before going into production, or they use to.

Finally, is there any benefits to the Standard Cayman over the S model, other than cost?

Thank you.




.

Last edited by GoHack; 03-18-2009 at 10:45 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Up!
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

Copyright ©2005-2010, This site is owned & operated by K-Man Group, LLC. It is not affiliated with Porsche AG, PCNA, PCA, or POC. www.planet-9.com is not sponsored by, authorized by, sanctioned by Porsche AG, Porscheplatz 1, DE-70435 Stuttgart, All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Please consult a competent mechanic before making any modifications to your car.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2