I've done quite a bit of reading and still haven't determined the best course of action.
I have a 2006 Boxster S with Bose and CDR-24. The sound really isn't bad, but it could be improved (really with just a half way decent EQ I think). CDR-24 is beyond help though. I've looked at add ons to get iPod and 20th century tech and I'm not sold on any of them. It just needs to go.
So new HU. Leaning towards the AVIC-X940BT. I don't like the motorized ones (one more thing that can break), plus I really like volume knobs (old school I suppose). I'm a fan of pioneer (as a general rule). I prefer Garmin though (so Kenwood is enticing), but I hate the interface on the Kenwood (from youtube reviews I've watched). Anyone with experience with either unit want to weight in?
Where I'm really stuck is whether to go aftermarket amp or keep the bose amp. If I understand things, using the MOST HUR adapter from euro motor speed makes the install pretty much idiot proof. I feel like with my next to zero experience with radio installs, I can handle this on my own (maybe). But the $850 price tag (over the $275) makes me rethink the aftermarket amp (which would surely have better sound right?) But which also will invariably require I pay someone to install - and I have trust issues when it comes to people working on my car. Most audio installers are hacks from my experience. But I digress...
Questions I have are:
1. Will I see better sound with the most HUR and the AVIC-X940BT (keeping everything else alone)? The AVIC-X940BT has an 8 band EQ, so I think the answer is yes. But I might be expecting too much here since the amp is probably more important. I'm not trying to go for a crazy pimped out sound system though. This upgrade is more about getting nav, bluetooth and my iPod working. But a slight sound upgrade would be nice, especially if I'm forking out $1500. That's too much for GPS and a usb plug for my iPod. I want a little more value.
2. How much harder is it to replace the amp? I've read through a lot of threads and it just seems really involved. I'm not opposed to paying for installation, but I feel like this $1500 job is going to suddenly become $3000 pretty quick (and I have to find someone I trust to do it - another problem altogether).
Fact of the matter is I spend a lot of time driving with the radio off honestly because the engine sound is boss when you work it. So I'm thinking $3000 is way more than I want to spend on a sound system. $1500 is even pushing it honestly, but CDR-24 just needs to go whatever the price.
Any input is greatly appreciated.
I have a 2006 Boxster S with Bose and CDR-24. The sound really isn't bad, but it could be improved (really with just a half way decent EQ I think). CDR-24 is beyond help though. I've looked at add ons to get iPod and 20th century tech and I'm not sold on any of them. It just needs to go.
So new HU. Leaning towards the AVIC-X940BT. I don't like the motorized ones (one more thing that can break), plus I really like volume knobs (old school I suppose). I'm a fan of pioneer (as a general rule). I prefer Garmin though (so Kenwood is enticing), but I hate the interface on the Kenwood (from youtube reviews I've watched). Anyone with experience with either unit want to weight in?
Where I'm really stuck is whether to go aftermarket amp or keep the bose amp. If I understand things, using the MOST HUR adapter from euro motor speed makes the install pretty much idiot proof. I feel like with my next to zero experience with radio installs, I can handle this on my own (maybe). But the $850 price tag (over the $275) makes me rethink the aftermarket amp (which would surely have better sound right?) But which also will invariably require I pay someone to install - and I have trust issues when it comes to people working on my car. Most audio installers are hacks from my experience. But I digress...
Questions I have are:
1. Will I see better sound with the most HUR and the AVIC-X940BT (keeping everything else alone)? The AVIC-X940BT has an 8 band EQ, so I think the answer is yes. But I might be expecting too much here since the amp is probably more important. I'm not trying to go for a crazy pimped out sound system though. This upgrade is more about getting nav, bluetooth and my iPod working. But a slight sound upgrade would be nice, especially if I'm forking out $1500. That's too much for GPS and a usb plug for my iPod. I want a little more value.
2. How much harder is it to replace the amp? I've read through a lot of threads and it just seems really involved. I'm not opposed to paying for installation, but I feel like this $1500 job is going to suddenly become $3000 pretty quick (and I have to find someone I trust to do it - another problem altogether).
Fact of the matter is I spend a lot of time driving with the radio off honestly because the engine sound is boss when you work it. So I'm thinking $3000 is way more than I want to spend on a sound system. $1500 is even pushing it honestly, but CDR-24 just needs to go whatever the price.
Any input is greatly appreciated.