Planet-9 Porsche Forum banner
  • NOTICE - Before adding photos to posts on Planet-9, please review: Posting Photos on Planet-9

Cayman vs. Lotus Elise on and off the track?

35K views 57 replies 38 participants last post by  BlueBlast  
#1 ·
I have seen a lot of threads comparing the Cayman to other Porsche models and other sports cars but what about the Elise? They seem similar in size. The Elise has less HP but does 0-60 in less time. The Porsche has way more storage and comfort inside. Looking just at the performance side of it which one comes out on top in terms of speed and handling?
 
#3 ·
Hawc,

I felt there was less leg room in the Elise. Seriously, if you want a fun car and can do without the extras, the Elise is a nice, enthusiasts car. It's light for a reason, though, and the Toyota power plant is uninspiring. The seats are definitely for the young and the getting in and out of it is reserved for Yoga students and gymnasts. While the design is very sleek, in person it looks a little too "plastic-y" for my taste.
 
#18 ·
Hawc,

I felt there was less leg room in the Elise. Seriously, if you want a fun car and can do without the extras, the Elise is a nice, enthusiasts car. ... The seats are definitely for the young and the getting in and out of it is reserved for Yoga students and gymnasts.
When I was shopping I looked at an Exige. Salesman told me the story of a guy who came into the showroom, got in and couldn't get out. Salesman tried to help. No go. Four salesman tried to get the guy out, couldn't do it. Just as they were about to call 911, the guy managed to get himself out.

So yeah, gymnasts and yoga gurus is about right.
 
#7 ·
at one pt i had both cay s and exige.
for track use, exige is cheaper to buy, less to mod and almost free to run. a set of tires RA1 is 600, pads (4) is 250. cayman s is 2x more.


for dual use, cay is more versatile.

cornering is more fun in lotus for sure.

exiting turn up to 70-80mph, lotus if faster, above 80, N/A lotus runs out of juice.
 
#8 ·
The Exige S is a tough track car to beat for the money. The amount of grip it generates and the insane handling are prodigious. And the sheer "raw" factor - which I love - is maybe only bested by a Noble.
 
#9 ·
Have spent a lot of time in Elise's at the track, and they are virtually without equal as a drive-off-the-showroom floor onto the track car. Amazing. But I can't imagine, even if I were ten years younger, commuting in the thing even in the summer. And we won't even talk about the things that fall off, or come loose, on brand new vehicles in the course of a day.

And the Noble. Please. These things are regulars at many of the events I attend, and I can't remember a single one running at the end of a single event. Not one. Couple of weeks ago two showed up...sure enough one needed to be pushed back into it's trailer; the other one came on it's own wheels and was still parked when I left...could it have survived? After dinner we saw it go by, on the back of a flatbed wrecker.

"If ya can't get a real car, get an English car, or a kit car."

Just don't get an English kit car.
 
#11 ·
Having driven both on and off a track I find ths question a doddle to answer:

Off the track : The Cayman, any longer than an hour on a less than perfect road will result in trips to the cyropractor in the lotus. Try getting out of a lotus in the parking space without damaging your neighbouring car... More comfort, better ride, more usable torque doesn't require the revs so high and therefore you can have a conversation with your passenger. Cayman is less common and far more of a head turner.

On the track: The lotus only the Lambourghini gallardo comes close to its handling, will change direction like a fly, perfectly balanced, light and likes the revs kept up as with all Japanese powerplants. Just don't do an endurance race in one

Well thats my two'penneth

What does everyone else think? Or should I play devil's advocate and do Cayman Vs Lotus Vs Caterham?
 
#13 ·
Well thats my two'penneth

What does everyone else think? Or should I play devil's advocate and do Cayman Vs Lotus Vs Caterham?
Karlton,

Sorry I didn't read your post before I wrote mine. The Cayman Vs Lotus Vs Caterham discussion would be good. I've had the privilege to drive a Seven on the Nordschleife, and I cannot imagine a more pure sports car experience. They are raw and certainly would be a challenge as a daily driver in the U.S. (too many pickups and SUVs), but I'd love to own one some day.

Chris
 
#12 ·
For a day at the track, Elise. For two days at the track, or a lifetime, Cayman S. For me a no brainer.

I've admired the Elise for years, but the incredible weight that it has put on over the years, coupled with the high price for a bare-bones car, effectively removed it from my radar. The folks on Elisetalk who think they have a minimalist car should try driving a Seven. Now THAT is a track car over which I'd get excited.

Finally, a I read a quote in (I believe) evo magazine from an Elise owner:

"Elise - Designed by gods, built by monkeys"

That speaks volumes about the car's quality. It's simply too expensive to be so unreliable.
 
#15 ·
"Elise - Designed by gods, built by monkeys"
totally correct. i have both, i am sure of it.

[/QUOTE]That speaks volumes about the car's quality. It's simply too expensive to be so unreliable.[/QUOTE]

i think you are confusing build quality with reliability.
lotus plasticky interior is cheap, rattles a lot, some bolts fall off every now and then... thus poor build quality. but it is dead reliable, and compare my exige and elise vs the three cayman s i had, lotus is a LOT MORE reliable.

but it's not a car, it's a toy. not many will drive it on street much. but of course i am insane, 9000 miles in 3 months.
 
#14 ·
Having driven a Lotus Elise, I would say it's more fun around a track than a Cayman S. I have also driven its big brother, the Lotus Exige S which caused cramp in my hands due to the enormous adrenaline rush. Both are huge fun in very short bursts. Both are totally impractical cars. I just couldn't drive an Elise as a daily driver.

I bought a CS because it is simply a much better all round car. The CS is a car that I can drive all year round, in any weather and in total comfort. It's a car that I can drive to work in, go shopping in or have a blast around a track in. It's also better built than the Lotus Elise/Exige.
 
#16 ·
Has anyone driven an Ariel Atom? Versus a Caterham, Lotus, Cayman, etc? I don't expect that you can get much more raw but I'm just going off of Top Gear, etc. They are coming to a track in Calgary, and charging for a days outing. Any experience out there?
 
#17 ·
Also having driven one, the real truth is that the elise is a go-kart, nothing more. So comparing the two is apples and oranges. Do you want a $70K car or a $45K go-kart? That's a silly choice for an adult.

BTW I named my daughter Elise.
 
#20 ·
I have only driven an Elise a couple of times and found the ingress/egress difficulty to be overstated. It does take some flexibility but I'm 52 and had no problem. When I was looking the resale value on them was taking a big hit. The go-kart comparisons are valid, extremely quick and responsive. I think the Cayman is much better looking and still is ablast to drive. My answer to this debate is in my driveway but if I had the money and room for another car the Exige S would get serious consideration.
 
#21 ·
First Post...

This is an interesting thread. I currently have a series 1 Lotus Elise and have used it as my everyday car for the last 7 years. Throughout that time it has been to the south of France several times and only the lack of air-con has really grated on me. However I am now at the point where I need something that offers the best of both worlds or at least that is what I think I have convinced myself of.

The Cayman S I test drove was superb, much better than I was expecting and ticked all the boxes (apart from the cost - they are hugely more expensive here in the UK and Porsche will not discount!). I've put a deposit down but am still in two minds. I realy would miss my Elise. After seven years of ownership it really is 'my' car. Everything has been changed (not always because it fell off ;) ), so it is still a tough decision.

Enjoy the photos.
 
#22 ·
Almost bought one...

Spent a whole of time on EliseTalk and basically made up my mind to get an Exige. But I sat down and made a list of pro's and con's and there were just too many con's. Like others have said, its just too unreliable and cheaply made. Granted the Toyota engine is bullet-proof, the rest of the car is far from that. Elise and Exige owners talk about all the rattles and sqeaks and little things that the car does, and they accept it as normal. Why pay $45K for a brand new car that does that? I am going to spend a little more and get a car performs well and will run the Lotus into the ground on a straight away. Although, the Lotus would runs circles around a Porsche on a curvy track...

Cant wait to get my CS! :banana:
 
#23 ·
Spent a whole of time on EliseTalk and basically made up my mind to get an Exige. But I sat down and made a list of pro's and con's and there were just too many con's. Like others have said, its just too unreliable and cheaply made. Granted the Toyota engine is bullet-proof, the rest of the car is far from that. Elise and Exige owners talk about all the rattles and sqeaks and little things that the car does, and they accept it as normal. Why pay $45K for a brand new car that does that? I am going to spend a little more and get a car performs well and will run the Lotus into the ground on a straight away. Although, the Lotus would runs circles around a Porsche on a curvy track...

Cant wait to get my CS! :banana:
one, unless it's 1/4 mile run, you will not leave lotus for dead on the straights. it will have higher corner entry speed, higher mid corner speed and lose a bit on exit speed, but it will be a close call hauling down the straight, but i you are talking standing starts, yes, cay will win.

two, cheaply made lotus? yes, that's why things fall off and rattle. but unreliable? no. it is more reliable than cayman. reliability and quality is not the same.

three, just b/c both cars are mid engine and small and kind of similarly priced (i use that term loosely) they really shouldn't be compared with each other imo. cayman is a great car while lotus is a nice toy. those who bought lotus as a car are in for a rude surprise.
 
#25 ·
yes, lotus is quicker to 60. but over 100, cayman will catch right up, very fast at that too.

i am not biased. i have had several caymans and two lotus. i am trying to provide data points to help those who are deciding.
 
#28 ·
Lotus make kit cars, much like TVR. I cannot get myself to take any manufacturer seriously that use engines from other manufacturers even if it has been modified. Lotus used to use a Ford engine before switching to a Toyota powerplant. The bodies are plastic and they do not look good after a few years use. To me it doesn't matter what the 0-60 time is, if they cannot build the complete article, they remain a kit car.

For the same reason, if I could afford it, I wouldn't own a Zonda (Merc engine) but would rather get a Ferrari, or better still a 911 Turbo or GT3, which come to think of is actually quite affordable...
 
#32 ·
nascar, lotus is all about the chassis. by my count they won 7 F1 constructors' world championships in their heyday. a good manufacturer will always mix and match. great if you have the resources of mercedes or ferrari but the racing world (not to mention everyday driving) would be a far duller place without these cost-constrained yet ingenious constructors. It was lotus that first introduced the racing world to aerodymic ground effects and i doubt mario addretti would trade his lotus f1 championship (the car had these effects) for a ferrari. my next car will hopefully be a lotus GT3!!
 
#29 ·
I have been running my Cayman S around Autobahn Country Club in Joliet and it is turning faster lap times than the Lotus's. Average speed around the full track is only about 75 mph and I would have to disagree about the entry & exit speeds as my Cayman S is faster all around the track. I think it is a perception issue, you feel like you are driving fast in a Lotus but in reality your actual speed isn't what your percieved speed is. Now my car does have PASM which does help a lot around the track. I was running in the 2:48s on Memorial day but have broken into the 2:46s there. Check out the track map at www.autobahncountryclub.net. As far as driving on the street there is no comparision, the Cayman S is much better.
 
#31 ·
my cayman S is on moton cs coil overs while the exige is on nitron DA.
i have faster lap time in cayman S but i think that's b/c i am not a good driver and use my brk too much and the low tq lotus get killed that way. given a good driver, i think it will really depend on track. at laguna seca, i think cayman s wins. but at tight track like sears point, i doubt cayman s will have a chance.
 
#37 ·
I'd also pretty much made up my mind to get an Elise. I'd test-driven one a couple of years ago and really enjoyed it (and getting in and out isn't that bad, I basically use the same technique I use to get in and out of a car with a cage).

So a couple of months ago, when my wife decided to buy me a car (!), we went in with the intent of looking at that and the Cayman S (and if it was convenient, which it ended up not being, a M Coupe). I re-test-drove the Elise, and still liked it.

I went with the Cayman S for a few reasons.

First, when we were looking, it was with the intent of replacing a day-in-day-out daily driver. I can deal with a certain level of unreliability, but if the New Car wasn't available for some reason, I was going to end up driving our truck or our old CRX Si, neither of which appeal to me all that much. It's not so much that I think the Elise would be unreliable (the powertrain seems stout), but the local Lotus dealer has a terrible reputation for service. So putting "slightly unreliable" and "iffy local service options" together seemed like not the best plan. If I lived near a better Lotus dealer, things might have been different. Or if we'd planned on adding the Elise to the pile rather than replacing a car with the Elise, that might have changed things, too. (As it turns out, we kept the M Roadster the New Car was supposed to replace. Ah, well...)

Second, when I asked to see the trunk of the Elise, the one we opened up was quite wet. Like, the owners manual was mildewed. That's one thing I just can't abide: like a boat, the water always belongs on the outside. I freely admit that's a personal pet peeve. Our Elise-owning friend says that it's a known problem, it's something like if you park the car downhill -- or is it uphill? -- and it rains a lot, the trunk's not unlikely to be wet.

Third, my office is 220 miles away from my house. I only go to my office once a week, in general, but that's around 3.5 hours each direction, and I go up, work a full day, then head back the same evening. I've driven a 993 racecar on the street (it had tags and insurance) about six hours total in one day, and a 944 S2 and M3 racecars (again, with tags and insurance) maybe five hours total in one day... and I could do it, and I could even go for longer, but all of those were getting kinda uncomfortable near the end. I wanted the New Car in part to liven up the commute, and while I think I'm pretty hardcore, I had to admit the possibility that I'm not that hardcore.

So all together, it was Cayman 1, Elise 0. If any one of those things had been different, it might have ended up differently.

I'm enjoying the Cayman. I figured that no matter which I chose, I'd end up thinking about how the other half lives!

-Steve
 
#40 · (Edited)
This is quite an old thread but I thought I'd revive it since I'm considering selling my 06 Elise for a Cayman S. Please keep in mind that neither car is in any way a daily driver. I probably drive the Elise 1-2 times a week for fun so ergonomics, comfort, daily drive properties don't bug me too much. Although I must admit I may be more tempted to drive it more often if it was a bit more luxurious (nice leather, auto climate control, other fun tech stuff)

What I'm looking for is information on build quality on the Cayman S and fun factor. The Elise has pretty good acceleration on the 2nd cam and mediocre below 6,000 rpms. I test drove a Cayman S and it definitely felt more torquey but did not feel faster all out than the Elise (I only took the Cayman S to 80 mph). The brakes on the CS were pretty good, steering was pretty good but nowhere near as sharp turn in as the Elise. Aka does the Cayman S honestly handle a larger more refined Elise? I haven't found a car that handles quite like the Lotus yet, it's simply telepathic.

As far as build quality the Porsche seemed impressive, no major squeaks or rattles. I have read a few threads here about people complaining about squeaks, rattles and pulling the interior apart to stuff foam and velcro to quiet it down. If I go with the Porsche I would expect aboslutely ZERO issues like that as it's a bit tiring on the Elise sometimes (have a random buzz sometimes but otherwise pretty squeak free).

I guess the best way to explain what I'm looking for is that the Elise is a 4 on a scale of 1-10 for luxury/comfort. I think the Cayman S is about a 8. However to me on pure driving fun alone I think the Elise is about a 9 and when I test drove the Cayman S (albeit a short test drive on city streets) it only felt like a 6. For you guys that owned both, when you get a Cayman S onto a track, autocross or twisty road does that 6 go up to a 8 or 9? If so I think I'm sold.
 
#42 ·
I guess the best way to explain what I'm looking for is that the Elise is a 4 on a scale of 1-10 for luxury/comfort. I think the Cayman S is about a 8. However to me on pure driving fun alone I think the Elise is about a 9 and when I test drove the Cayman S (albeit a short test drive on city streets) it only felt like a 6. For you guys that owned both, when you get a Cayman S onto a track, autocross or twisty road does that 6 go up to a 8 or 9? If so I think I'm sold.
I've driven both, but haven't owned both so I can't answer your question definitively. Like gmsracing says, the Cayman is very different to drive depending on how you choose to drive it. If you drive it like a sedan, it feels smooth like a sedan (especially if you have PASM and set it to "soft"). It also can be quite deceptive feeling much slower than it actually is. On the other hand, driven with spirit on a twisty road, it's a lot of fun. The Elise I drove felt like it would be raw 100% of the time, which I think explains a lot of the low mileage sales.

I still lust after a Lotus and wonder if I did the right thing, especially now the SC is available. But the final selling point for the Cayman S for me wasn't even the comfort and build quality, it was the sheer usefulness of the car and especially the cargo space. Between the two trunks and various clever cubbies the car is a veritable TARDIS. Passengers and onlookers at the grocery store are always shocked at just how much you can pack into one without ever needing to use the passenger seat. I figure if I had bought the Elise there would have been many more times I would have chosen to leave it at home in favor of something with a real trunk. I love to drive the Cayman and take every excuse I can, whether it be to Home Depot, or a 1000 mile road trip. More miles at 8/10 adds up to more average fun than fewer miles at 9/10.

Oh yes, and the air conditioning doesn't freeze up, and dings don't cause $15,000 clam replacement.
 
#41 · (Edited)
Driven an '05 Elise sport package hard. Own a '08 CS. My plan is that my next car will be a used Elise. (In addition to the CS!)

Honestly, the CS doesn't really impress you much driving at 5/6 tenths. But that is exactly why it is such a great dual purpose car. I didn't purchase one for a whole year because of a slow test drive. I finally ordered one on "faith" knowing that it must be better than that one test drive. When I took delivery and finally got to play with it, I was blown away by how complete and fun a car it was. You just can't experience that in a slow test drive. It just doesn't feel that fast or sharp at 5/6 10ths. The CS comes alive the harder you push it. It doesn't really have too many bad habits and the motor really comes alive in the upper power band.

The real key to the CS is to get some more power out of it. You can pretty easily get them to 350 hp with bolt on stuff and that really transforms the car. This solves pretty much any complaint people have about it feeling sluggish or slow. If you do that with a low option car (like mine) that puts it at about 8.4 lbs/hp compared to the stock 10.

When I was on track last year (stock CS) I had to work pretty hard to chase down an Elise. They were surprisingly fast even on the straights! I was expecting to be able to pull him out of the corners a bit but that didn't happen. I had to set up a pass from several corners back in order to have enough speed to get around him by the end of the front straight. All and all I felt pretty evenly matched.
 
#44 ·
Great input, I think that's what I experienced on my test drive. It was night time, cold and the car only had 3,000 miles on it so I didn't want to beat it to death. It felt quick but not what I was expecting. Perhaps another test drive on a twisty road is in order.
 
#46 ·
UK Garage Presents Lotus Extrema

Now this is a Lotus Exige I could really sink my teeth into.. very deeply! :D

Italian tuner UK Garage is presenting its latest project, the Lotus Exige-based Extrema. UK Garage works on such names as TVR, Noble and Radical. Plenty of work has gone into the Extrema from when it was an Exige up until its current format. Beginning with engine, buyers are spoiled for choice as they wade through a list that comprises exclusively of GM powerplants. At the entry point is a 2.6-litre with 360hp (265kW) followed by a 2.8-litre making 450hp (331kW) or a 560hp (412kW) 3.4-litre version. All three use a PowerTech V8 engine weighing 95kg. With this engine total vehicle mass does not exceed 750kg.

Moving to the next menu is GM's 2.8-litre V6 turbo that either produces 300hp (221kW) or 350hp (257kW). With this mill fitted the car goes up to 850kg in weight which is still very light. Up the performance ladder is where things get more interesting. UK Garage offers potential customers a register comprised of Chevy nd Corvette powerplants that will be fitted into their Extremas. Again starting from the bottom there are two Chevrolet LS3s making either 420hp (309kW) or 500hp (368kW) each. At this level weight goes up a notch to about 970kg.

Those who long for absolute Extrema grunt, the 513hp (377kW) LS7 or the LS9 found in a Corvette ZR1 with 647hp (476kW) can be selected. This time vehicle mass reaches 1,000kg. This particular combination allows the Extrema to reach 100km/h from standstill in 2.8 seconds, 0 - 200km/h in 7 seconds and top off at 320km/h. Gearshifts are taken care of courtesy of either a manual or a sequential transmission system.

The Extrema has an aluminium chassis, and buyers can have either fiberglass or a kevlar-carbon composite body fitted. The body has been lengthened by some 20cm to accommodate these big engines. It has also been widened for the bigger tyres and equipped with an adjustable suspension system.
All this comes at a price of €66,000 including taxes for the baseline model while road-legal conversions can be made at extra cost.
Image


Image
 
#47 ·
Traded a 2006 Elise w/ Sport Pack for my present 2007 CS. The Elise is a great track car although its clanky shifter is a real pain and it's hard to heel/toe without pedal mods. It's not a very good road car and certainly not for daily driving IMO. The getting in and out issue can be mastered, but crawling over that huge sill makes you wonder why you're forced to do it. The CS is a real car vs the Elise which feels like a stripper inside the cockpit. However, the Elise particularly in the bright red I had is always a head turner.